Type of Label

Description

This field describes what it the main activity of a Label.

The values may be:

  • one of the "production" subtypes, that applies to recording labels (in the basic meaning of the term - an imprint):

    • original production: should be used for recording labels producing entirely new releases

      • example: Riverside Records

    • bootleg production: should be used for known bootlegs companies (as in "not sanctioned by the rights owner(s) of the released work")

      • example: Charly Records

    • reissue production: should be used for labels specializing in catalog reissues

      • example: Rhino

  • distributor: should be used for companies mainly distributing other labels production, usually in a specific region of the world

    • example: ZYX, which distributes in Europe most jazz records in the Concord Music Group catalog.

  • holding: should be used for holdings, conglomerates or other financial entities whose main activity is not to produce records, but to manage a large set of recording labels owned by them

    • example: Concord Music Group

Additional Informations

Multiple types

While most cases are pretty straightforward, there may be some where a label apparently belong to two or more different types. To some extent, the problem is similar with the releases type. Whenever that happens, you should decide based on what constitutes the main activity type of the label. While searching, you might discover that the label has different subdivisions, each handling a different activity (as an example, think about the recording label Verve, and the holding Verve Music Group). Ultimately, if there's still an ambiguity, you should use the LabelAnnotation to provide with more detailed informations.

Labels types shifting during history

Some labels have a long and troubled life, and change their main activity (say, from original to reissue, to holding). There's no way at that time to handle or properly represent that. Again, for anything that complex, use LabelAnnotations.

If you really can't decide of a type yourself, look at the releases list for that label, count the compilations, count the albums, count the bootlegs, compare, choose.

In all cases, remember the label type is a convenient indication at best, and that things should be kept simple.

Bootlegs

The bootleg type should be handled with some care, as legal issues are not usually trivial, and may even be impossible to sort out (think about the Charles Mingus "bootlegs" issued by the as-official-as-it-can-be French INA). Ultimately, you should not mark a company as bootleg just because one of its release is marked as such.

Labels suggested readings

Labels in MusicBrainz are an important and relatively complex topic. It's recommended that you first start familiarizing yourself with the basic concepts in the General information category of the navigation bar (up that page).

You may then consult the documentation pertaining to AdvancedRelationships and labels, which are listed on the LabelRelationshipClass page.

Editors who want to do more researches, may consult one of the items listed under Advanced documentation.

If you still need help, you may ask your question on the UsersMailingList, the MusicBrainzForum, the IRC channel, or the [WWW] LabelDiscussion page.

If you're interested in either the future or the past, you may additionally consult/contribute to LabelFuture (suggest enhancements, list problems and limitations, or propose a new masterplan), or LabelHistory (for a list of fixed tickets and some interesting insight into the old days)


CategoryTerminology CategoryLabel CategoryWikiDocsPage

This page is part of the official MusicBrainz editor documentation (version 1.0), and is monitored by TransclusionEditor: dmppanda

 
Creative Commons EFF GPL LGPL This material is Open Knowledge Valid XHTML 1.1 Valid CSS 2.0
Original Design|vacubomb.com Contact details Server version: RELEASE-20071014